<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Scott&#039;s Blog of Doom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rspwfaq.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com</link>
	<description>Dungeon of Death: Chris Benoit and the Hart Family Curse is available NOW!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:18:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on UFC 66: Liddell vs. Ortiz 2 by biznizness</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/19/ufc-66-liddell-vs-ortiz-2/comment-page-1/#comment-490899</link>
		<dc:creator>biznizness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/?p=2139#comment-490899</guid>
		<description>&quot;The key to beating Liddell was to just be good enough to stand and throw bombs with him and hope you connect with something big before he does.&quot;

No, I&#039;m pretty sure that was exactly the wrong approach, and that was how Chuck racked up all those KO&#039;s.  They weren&#039;t wrong about how to beat Chuck... they just couldn&#039;t do it.  Randy did it, but nobody else had the wrestling chops to control Chuck.  Because if they did, they would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The key to beating Liddell was to just be good enough to stand and throw bombs with him and hope you connect with something big before he does.&#8221;</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m pretty sure that was exactly the wrong approach, and that was how Chuck racked up all those KO&#8217;s.  They weren&#8217;t wrong about how to beat Chuck&#8230; they just couldn&#8217;t do it.  Randy did it, but nobody else had the wrestling chops to control Chuck.  Because if they did, they would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SmarK Legacy Rant for Monday Night RAW &#8211; December 6 1993 by Chad Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/comment-page-1/#comment-490897</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/#comment-490897</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised that &quot;smart&quot; marks continue to misinterpret Heenan&#039;s remark.

You see, Bobby Heenan had built a career as a manager and commentator on trashing Hulk Hogan. Heenan managed various incarnations of his &quot;Family&quot; in feuds against Hogan for the better part of a decade, in the AWA and WWF. It was always in Heenan&#039;s nature to cast doubt on Hogan&#039;s motive (or simply lie about him). He had a direct hand in turning not one, but two of Hogan&#039;s best friends against him by convincing them that Hogan was selfish and didn&#039;t care about them, and only cared for himself. This (like much of WWF canon involving Hogan) was carried over to WCW.

Of course, he was always proven wrong, and Hogan always did &quot;the right thing&quot; and &quot;saved the day&quot; - until that night. Hogan&#039;s turn on WCW was Heenan&#039;s vindication. It&#039;s the old &quot;even a broken clock is right twice a day&quot; adage, and it&#039;s one of the more notable cases of WCW booking something right, down to the very last detail.

I&#039;m not surprised that people still parrot the &quot;Heenan screwed up&quot; BS 13 years later, but sometimes, it&#039;s sorely disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that &#8220;smart&#8221; marks continue to misinterpret Heenan&#8217;s remark.</p>
<p>You see, Bobby Heenan had built a career as a manager and commentator on trashing Hulk Hogan. Heenan managed various incarnations of his &#8220;Family&#8221; in feuds against Hogan for the better part of a decade, in the AWA and WWF. It was always in Heenan&#8217;s nature to cast doubt on Hogan&#8217;s motive (or simply lie about him). He had a direct hand in turning not one, but two of Hogan&#8217;s best friends against him by convincing them that Hogan was selfish and didn&#8217;t care about them, and only cared for himself. This (like much of WWF canon involving Hogan) was carried over to WCW.</p>
<p>Of course, he was always proven wrong, and Hogan always did &#8220;the right thing&#8221; and &#8220;saved the day&#8221; &#8211; until that night. Hogan&#8217;s turn on WCW was Heenan&#8217;s vindication. It&#8217;s the old &#8220;even a broken clock is right twice a day&#8221; adage, and it&#8217;s one of the more notable cases of WCW booking something right, down to the very last detail.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that people still parrot the &#8220;Heenan screwed up&#8221; BS 13 years later, but sometimes, it&#8217;s sorely disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SmarK Legacy Rant for Monday Night RAW &#8211; December 6 1993 by Ryan721</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/comment-page-1/#comment-490894</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan721</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/#comment-490894</guid>
		<description>The best part of the Prime Time&#039;s is that there is no script. The banter between them is genuine and not created in an office. That&#039;s one of the reasons of the shows success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best part of the Prime Time&#8217;s is that there is no script. The banter between them is genuine and not created in an office. That&#8217;s one of the reasons of the shows success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SmarK Legacy Rant for Monday Night RAW &#8211; December 6 1993 by Ryan721</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/comment-page-1/#comment-490893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan721</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/#comment-490893</guid>
		<description>Welcome. As payment you may bring me a shrubbery. Not to tall though..I need to build a path..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome. As payment you may bring me a shrubbery. Not to tall though..I need to build a path..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Make Me Watch A Fight! by bones1387</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/make-me-watch-a-fight/comment-page-1/#comment-490892</link>
		<dc:creator>bones1387</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/make-me-watch-a-fight/#comment-490892</guid>
		<description>hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UFC 66: Liddell vs. Ortiz 2 by Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/19/ufc-66-liddell-vs-ortiz-2/comment-page-1/#comment-490891</link>
		<dc:creator>Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 08:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/?p=2139#comment-490891</guid>
		<description>&quot;Dana &quot;Ice Ice Baby&quot; White calls Liddell a &quot;fucking asshole&quot; a couple of times during the official announcement.&quot;

It was because Liddell told him he took the fight with the injured MCL! Chuck injured it during training and decided to fight anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Dana &#8220;Ice Ice Baby&#8221; White calls Liddell a &#8220;fucking asshole&#8221; a couple of times during the official announcement.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was because Liddell told him he took the fight with the injured MCL! Chuck injured it during training and decided to fight anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SmarK Legacy Rant for Monday Night RAW &#8211; December 6 1993 by jvc113</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/comment-page-1/#comment-490890</link>
		<dc:creator>jvc113</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/#comment-490890</guid>
		<description>I think, though, that the last great piece of business Heenan was a part of was in WCW in 1996, when he &quot;coached&quot; (not managed, because he retired as a manager) Flair and Arn Anderson against the Football Team at The 1996 Great American Bash. That was really good. 

I LOVE watching these old Prime Time wrestlings with Heenan and Monsoon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think, though, that the last great piece of business Heenan was a part of was in WCW in 1996, when he &#8220;coached&#8221; (not managed, because he retired as a manager) Flair and Arn Anderson against the Football Team at The 1996 Great American Bash. That was really good. </p>
<p>I LOVE watching these old Prime Time wrestlings with Heenan and Monsoon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The SmarK Legacy Rant for Monday Night RAW &#8211; December 6 1993 by jvc113</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/comment-page-1/#comment-490889</link>
		<dc:creator>jvc113</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/18/the-smark-legacy-rant-for-monday-night-raw-december-6-1993/#comment-490889</guid>
		<description>THANK YOU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UFC 66: Liddell vs. Ortiz 2 by TPrincess</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/19/ufc-66-liddell-vs-ortiz-2/comment-page-1/#comment-490888</link>
		<dc:creator>TPrincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/?p=2139#comment-490888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll never agree with that being Bush. He followed up on a punch. It&#039;s the referee&#039;s job to stop the action it&#039;s the fighter&#039;s job to fight. He was doing what he&#039;s paid to do.

Do I think the referee was asleep at the wheel? Absolutely, but I don&#039;t know if it was unintentional, much like Mazzagatti&#039;s lackadaisical response to Lesnar tapping out to Mir wasn&#039;t unintentional. 

Both were situations, I believe, to allow certain guys to be humbled. Like any sport where rookies take their lumps from the veterans.

But do I blame Henderson, absolutely not. He&#039;s doing his job. If they don&#039;t like follow-up punches, change the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll never agree with that being Bush. He followed up on a punch. It&#8217;s the referee&#8217;s job to stop the action it&#8217;s the fighter&#8217;s job to fight. He was doing what he&#8217;s paid to do.</p>
<p>Do I think the referee was asleep at the wheel? Absolutely, but I don&#8217;t know if it was unintentional, much like Mazzagatti&#8217;s lackadaisical response to Lesnar tapping out to Mir wasn&#8217;t unintentional. </p>
<p>Both were situations, I believe, to allow certain guys to be humbled. Like any sport where rookies take their lumps from the veterans.</p>
<p>But do I blame Henderson, absolutely not. He&#8217;s doing his job. If they don&#8217;t like follow-up punches, change the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UFC 66: Liddell vs. Ortiz 2 by myfactsareright</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/11/19/ufc-66-liddell-vs-ortiz-2/comment-page-1/#comment-490887</link>
		<dc:creator>myfactsareright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/?p=2139#comment-490887</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s already UFC 108? I swear we just had 105. Oh and for some reason I have lost complete interest in UFC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s already UFC 108? I swear we just had 105. Oh and for some reason I have lost complete interest in UFC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
