<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History of the World title</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/</link>
	<description>Dungeon of Death: Chris Benoit and the Hart Family Curse is available NOW!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:24:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489980</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489980</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not going to get anywhere if the only evidence you cite is &quot;markazines&quot;. Thanks for playing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not going to get anywhere if the only evidence you cite is &#8220;markazines&#8221;. Thanks for playing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny C</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489966</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489966</guid>
		<description>I was watching WCW in 1993, and none of what I have said was based on wikipedia articles or markboard reports. Any references to those things were just the icing. The cake was that WCW Main Events normally revolved around the WCW World Champion at the time, and that the markazines like PWI referred to the WCW Champion as a World Champion, and the NWA Champion as just a Heavyweight Champion. Anything the markboards or wikipedia say/said is jut extra.

You&#039;re not Dennis Trobich trolling here, are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was watching WCW in 1993, and none of what I have said was based on wikipedia articles or markboard reports. Any references to those things were just the icing. The cake was that WCW Main Events normally revolved around the WCW World Champion at the time, and that the markazines like PWI referred to the WCW Champion as a World Champion, and the NWA Champion as just a Heavyweight Champion. Anything the markboards or wikipedia say/said is jut extra.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re not Dennis Trobich trolling here, are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl The Hitman</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489959</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl The Hitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489959</guid>
		<description>Why not throw in the MITB winner as well while you&#039;re wishing for things that aren&#039;t likely at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not throw in the MITB winner as well while you&#8217;re wishing for things that aren&#8217;t likely at this point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scalaaz</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489953</link>
		<dc:creator>scalaaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489953</guid>
		<description>Is it too much to ask to have a fatal four-way unification match at Mania for the Undisputed Championship of the world featuring the Raw Champ, Smackdown Champ, ECW Champ, and Royal Rumble winner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it too much to ask to have a fatal four-way unification match at Mania for the Undisputed Championship of the world featuring the Raw Champ, Smackdown Champ, ECW Champ, and Royal Rumble winner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489949</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489949</guid>
		<description>And once again, I think you&#039;d actually have a point to make if you&#039;d actually been watching WCW in 1993, and not forming your opinion based on Wikipedia articles and markboard reports falsely attributed to Dave Meltzer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And once again, I think you&#8217;d actually have a point to make if you&#8217;d actually been watching WCW in 1993, and not forming your opinion based on Wikipedia articles and markboard reports falsely attributed to Dave Meltzer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: red29</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489933</link>
		<dc:creator>red29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489933</guid>
		<description>Funny, I had just looked at this on amazon the other day and there was no match listing up (yet a December release).  Thought maybe the date was wrong.

&quot;Nitro 7/6/98 - Hollywood Hogan vs. Goldberg&quot;

Obviously this has been on a couple DVDs but I never fail to laugh when the camera cuts to Karl Freaking Malone outside the ring (it was a good diamond cutter at least) and they miss Goldberg&#039;s power kickout after the leg drop - which was kind of really significant, all things considered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I had just looked at this on amazon the other day and there was no match listing up (yet a December release).  Thought maybe the date was wrong.</p>
<p>&#8220;Nitro 7/6/98 &#8211; Hollywood Hogan vs. Goldberg&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously this has been on a couple DVDs but I never fail to laugh when the camera cuts to Karl Freaking Malone outside the ring (it was a good diamond cutter at least) and they miss Goldberg&#8217;s power kickout after the leg drop &#8211; which was kind of really significant, all things considered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny C</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489917</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489917</guid>
		<description>Yes, Flair&#039;s NWA win was called a &quot;World Title win&quot;, but when people win the ScyFy ECW Title today, WWE calls it a &quot;World Title win&quot;. And?

For the ordinary fan watching WCW at the time, and following the business through the markazines that still sold lots of copies at the time, they would have felt that the WCW Title was the #1 Title in WCW at the time. WCW Title matches typically headlined shows, and PPV Main Events were based around whatever match the WCW Champion was in. Windham or Flair never got to shoot a minimovie somewhere in the Gulf of Mexico now did they?

Vader only had the belt when his segment directly related to the Title itself. Otherwise you get stupidity where a tag team champion fights in a singles match, and then lifts the belt over his head after the match, as though he&#039;s successfully defended it, when in fact the match he&#039;s just been in wasn&#039;t even a tag match! Or a champion celebrating after surviving a Survivor Series match with the belt! If the Title was actually involved, Vader had his WORLD Title belt.

Also, the NWA and WCW Tag Champions were the same people at this point. And the NWA have tried to appropriate the WCW Tag Title lineage as well, whereas their belts only stretch back to 1992!

Anyway, the basic point, again, was that WWE now recognize that Windham, Flair and others were NWA Champion, yet they also claim that the WCW Title is the same thing as the 1948 NWA Title. And this after they even had the NWA Champion on RAW back in 1998 or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Flair&#8217;s NWA win was called a &#8220;World Title win&#8221;, but when people win the ScyFy ECW Title today, WWE calls it a &#8220;World Title win&#8221;. And?</p>
<p>For the ordinary fan watching WCW at the time, and following the business through the markazines that still sold lots of copies at the time, they would have felt that the WCW Title was the #1 Title in WCW at the time. WCW Title matches typically headlined shows, and PPV Main Events were based around whatever match the WCW Champion was in. Windham or Flair never got to shoot a minimovie somewhere in the Gulf of Mexico now did they?</p>
<p>Vader only had the belt when his segment directly related to the Title itself. Otherwise you get stupidity where a tag team champion fights in a singles match, and then lifts the belt over his head after the match, as though he&#8217;s successfully defended it, when in fact the match he&#8217;s just been in wasn&#8217;t even a tag match! Or a champion celebrating after surviving a Survivor Series match with the belt! If the Title was actually involved, Vader had his WORLD Title belt.</p>
<p>Also, the NWA and WCW Tag Champions were the same people at this point. And the NWA have tried to appropriate the WCW Tag Title lineage as well, whereas their belts only stretch back to 1992!</p>
<p>Anyway, the basic point, again, was that WWE now recognize that Windham, Flair and others were NWA Champion, yet they also claim that the WCW Title is the same thing as the 1948 NWA Title. And this after they even had the NWA Champion on RAW back in 1998 or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Bryant</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489896</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489896</guid>
		<description>&quot;It was quite clear from all the evtns that the ”’WCW”’ Champion was the Real World Champion, and the Main Event was typically the WCW World Title match.&quot;

Except for...

a) Flair returning to WCW in the spring of 1993, with WCW billing him as a nine-time world champion (at this point, they were specifically counting seven NWA &amp; two WWF reigns). When he beat Windham for the NWA belt, it was (once again, specifically) referred to as his tenth world title.

b) that period in mid-1993 where Vader was stuck in said horrible feud, being referred to as simply the &quot;WCW Champion&quot;, and sometimes not even wearing his title belt to the ring. 

To further reinforce the true point, while all of this was going on, the U.S. title was &quot;held up&quot; and not defended on TV between May and September, and explained away with an angle revolving around Rick Rude having stolen the belt after a disputed match with Dustin Rhodes, and holding it hostage in a briefcase. In fact, one of the first things WCW did after losing control of the NWA world title was to immediately put the almost-forgotten U.S. belt back on Dustin.

The statement &quot;the NWA belt was a secondary WCW Title at that point&quot; is wrong and uninformed. Before WCW had to abruptly switch gears because of the dispute over Rude&#039;s planned win, they had more than established that the NWA World &amp; World tag championships were the top prizes within WCW. Only the dispute (and the subsequent lawsuits) changed that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It was quite clear from all the evtns that the ”’WCW”’ Champion was the Real World Champion, and the Main Event was typically the WCW World Title match.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except for&#8230;</p>
<p>a) Flair returning to WCW in the spring of 1993, with WCW billing him as a nine-time world champion (at this point, they were specifically counting seven NWA &amp; two WWF reigns). When he beat Windham for the NWA belt, it was (once again, specifically) referred to as his tenth world title.</p>
<p>b) that period in mid-1993 where Vader was stuck in said horrible feud, being referred to as simply the &#8220;WCW Champion&#8221;, and sometimes not even wearing his title belt to the ring. </p>
<p>To further reinforce the true point, while all of this was going on, the U.S. title was &#8220;held up&#8221; and not defended on TV between May and September, and explained away with an angle revolving around Rick Rude having stolen the belt after a disputed match with Dustin Rhodes, and holding it hostage in a briefcase. In fact, one of the first things WCW did after losing control of the NWA world title was to immediately put the almost-forgotten U.S. belt back on Dustin.</p>
<p>The statement &#8220;the NWA belt was a secondary WCW Title at that point&#8221; is wrong and uninformed. Before WCW had to abruptly switch gears because of the dispute over Rude&#8217;s planned win, they had more than established that the NWA World &amp; World tag championships were the top prizes within WCW. Only the dispute (and the subsequent lawsuits) changed that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny C</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489893</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489893</guid>
		<description>ER, no. It was quite clear from all the evtns that the &#039;&#039;&#039;WCW&#039;&#039;&#039; Champion was the Real World Champion, and the Main Event was typically the WCW World Title match. I even remember reports that at at least one show, the NWA Title guys were warned about NOT putting on too good a match, in case it took away from the importance of the WCW match. Whenever anyone at the time talked about the &quot;2 World Champions&quot;, they meant WWF and WCW, not WWF and NWA, and all the magazines, such as PWI, referred to the WCW Champion as the World Champion, and the NWA Champion as just that...the NWA Champion.

Furthermore, WCW actually had you know a roster of wrestlers. They had their own tv shows, magazine, brand etc. All the NWA had was a name. That&#039;s why in 1994 the NWA had to piggyback ECW for their tournament, and we all know how THAT ended up.

Nobody ever said that Flair wasn&#039;t NWA Champion in 1993, but that title was a shadow of what it had been in 1983.

And anyway the point was that WWE are now claiming that the lineage went NWA-WCW-World, meaning that in 1993 the guy holding what was the NWA Title in 1948 would have been the WCW Champion. But by WWE recognizing that Flair, Windham were NWA Champion, WWE&#039;s are refuting their own claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ER, no. It was quite clear from all the evtns that the &#8221;&#8217;WCW&#8221;&#8217; Champion was the Real World Champion, and the Main Event was typically the WCW World Title match. I even remember reports that at at least one show, the NWA Title guys were warned about NOT putting on too good a match, in case it took away from the importance of the WCW match. Whenever anyone at the time talked about the &#8220;2 World Champions&#8221;, they meant WWF and WCW, not WWF and NWA, and all the magazines, such as PWI, referred to the WCW Champion as the World Champion, and the NWA Champion as just that&#8230;the NWA Champion.</p>
<p>Furthermore, WCW actually had you know a roster of wrestlers. They had their own tv shows, magazine, brand etc. All the NWA had was a name. That&#8217;s why in 1994 the NWA had to piggyback ECW for their tournament, and we all know how THAT ended up.</p>
<p>Nobody ever said that Flair wasn&#8217;t NWA Champion in 1993, but that title was a shadow of what it had been in 1983.</p>
<p>And anyway the point was that WWE are now claiming that the lineage went NWA-WCW-World, meaning that in 1993 the guy holding what was the NWA Title in 1948 would have been the WCW Champion. But by WWE recognizing that Flair, Windham were NWA Champion, WWE&#8217;s are refuting their own claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TAFKA TVs Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/comment-page-1/#comment-489877</link>
		<dc:creator>TAFKA TVs Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2009/10/30/history-of-the-world-title/#comment-489877</guid>
		<description>The truth is that you can trace the lineage of any major title in professional wrestling to a couple of promoters (usually of varying statures in the industry) meeting in a basement or hotel or wherever to select a champion. So Lou Thesz &#039;winning&#039; a title means about as much as Undertaker or Blue Demon winning one, the only difference being the power and visibilty of the promoter involved and their influence in writing (or rewriting the history.

That&#039;s the ultimate irony of HHH being handed the &#039;World Title&#039; by Eric Bischoff on live TV: that&#039;s the way it&#039;s been done for decades and most of us realized this, but that was the first time we were basically slapped across the face with the fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth is that you can trace the lineage of any major title in professional wrestling to a couple of promoters (usually of varying statures in the industry) meeting in a basement or hotel or wherever to select a champion. So Lou Thesz &#8216;winning&#8217; a title means about as much as Undertaker or Blue Demon winning one, the only difference being the power and visibilty of the promoter involved and their influence in writing (or rewriting the history.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the ultimate irony of HHH being handed the &#8216;World Title&#8217; by Eric Bischoff on live TV: that&#8217;s the way it&#8217;s been done for decades and most of us realized this, but that was the first time we were basically slapped across the face with the fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
