Archive for October 21st, 2009

Fuji

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

So this past weekend I was inspired by Captain Lou’s passing as well as some water cooler talk about “the best manager” to rent the WWE World’s Greatest Wrestling Managers DVD. I enjoyed the look back at the greats, it's a fun rental. However I was surprised that someone like Paul Heyman got a substantial amount of spotlight as a manager in the AWA whereas Mr. Fuji, who despite the inclusion of Fuji Vice in the extras, didn’t get much attention at all. He’s managed many champions and was a part of the WWF/E for many, many years.

Why do you think he got the snub?

 

Because he was a terrible manager, mainly I’d guess.  Yeah, he was a great guy and decent worker and an easy source of heat, but it’s not like he was adding much to guys like Muraco or Demolition who could already talk for themselves just fine.  There’s not really any highlight reel of catchphrases or great interviews from him to focus on, either, like you get with Jimmy Hart, Bobby Heenan or Freddie Blassie.    He was really just a shorthand way for the promotion to establish that someone on the borderline of crowd reactions is DEFINITELY a heel.  Like Berzerker, where people didn’t really know whether to cheer or boo the act, so they stuck Fuji with him randomly and people were like “Oh, it’s Fuji, let’s boo him.” 

That being said, much love to him for his sense of humor and being around all those years, plus of course for Fuji Vice.

CivBook

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

I think I ought to start drawing up plenty of quickie divorce papers
just in case.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3176589

 

You know, I was just thinking to myself, “Man, Facebook really needs a good time-wasting game, because that’s the one thing it’s been lacking.”  I’d even take a Facebook version of Civ 2 and be deliriously happy and addicted all over again.

Haterade

Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

Hey, Scott I am a big fan of yours and I pretty much have all of your books.  Don't you think you are being unfair to TNA when you make a comment like Nigel McGuiness being in TNA  "sets him back about 100 steps right out of the gate."

You've admitted that You don't even watch TNA.  So how can you say that being in TNA is bad for him when TNA is producing the best wrestling product since 2005.  They had an excellent pay per view (Bound for Glory).  Their Impact show has been excellent for the past couple of months. Their champion is a home grown talent, A J. Styles.  They are showcasing tons of young talent (Eric Young, Hernandez, British Invasion).

You predicted that they would sign WWE rejects like Chris Masters, and Mr. Kennedy.  Masters is back with the WWE and Kennedy has sign with no one.

Why the hate?  I don't get it. 

 

Really?  Do I really need to list the reasons why Vince Russo running a supposedly major company filled with goofy gimmick matches and WWE retreads wouldn’t appeal to me? 

And I have honestly never heard the words “TNA Impact” and “excellent” in the same sentence before, but I’m glad you’re enjoying the product.