<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sequels that didn&#8217;t suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/</link>
	<description>Dungeon of Death: Chris Benoit and the Hart Family Curse is available NOW!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:14:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vincentfloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447326</link>
		<dc:creator>vincentfloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 02:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447326</guid>
		<description>um...Silence of the Lambs? Road Warrior?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um&#8230;Silence of the Lambs? Road Warrior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samoaray25</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447272</link>
		<dc:creator>samoaray25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447272</guid>
		<description>RE:  Highlander 2 has to be the best though - just kidding - that was true garbage.

You know I had a case of &quot;The Quickening&quot; last year, but the doctor gave me some antibiotics and it cleared right up.

Sadly not Sean Connery&#039;s worst film *coughAvengerscough*coughMedicineMancough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE:  Highlander 2 has to be the best though &#8211; just kidding &#8211; that was true garbage.</p>
<p>You know I had a case of &#8220;The Quickening&#8221; last year, but the doctor gave me some antibiotics and it cleared right up.</p>
<p>Sadly not Sean Connery&#8217;s worst film *coughAvengerscough*coughMedicineMancough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHough610</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447099</link>
		<dc:creator>SHough610</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 04:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447099</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how you can place the Matrix Reloaded over Godfather II. I friggin love Godfather II so much. In my eyes my top three sequels of all time go: Godfather II, Terminator II, Dark Knight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how you can place the Matrix Reloaded over Godfather II. I friggin love Godfather II so much. In my eyes my top three sequels of all time go: Godfather II, Terminator II, Dark Knight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitefish</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447078</link>
		<dc:creator>whitefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447078</guid>
		<description>The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly is a great film. While it&#039;s considered part of The Man With No Name trilogy, is it really a sequel? Is Eastwood playing the same character in all three flicks (Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More, Good, Bad, and the Ugly)? It&#039;s debatable, but still a classic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly is a great film. While it&#8217;s considered part of The Man With No Name trilogy, is it really a sequel? Is Eastwood playing the same character in all three flicks (Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More, Good, Bad, and the Ugly)? It&#8217;s debatable, but still a classic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmfabianorpl</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447077</link>
		<dc:creator>jmfabianorpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447077</guid>
		<description>Although it was the least good of the OT, I don&#039;t get all the putting down of ROTJ by some people.  It did what it was meant to do, and I was happy.  

FYI, the Ewok argument is now moot as they are no longer the lamest creatures in the Lucasverse (onesa guessa what eesa theesa answer forsa thatsa onesa ;-))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it was the least good of the OT, I don&#8217;t get all the putting down of ROTJ by some people.  It did what it was meant to do, and I was happy.  </p>
<p>FYI, the Ewok argument is now moot as they are no longer the lamest creatures in the Lucasverse (onesa guessa what eesa theesa answer forsa thatsa onesa <img src='http://www.rspwfaq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmfabianorpl</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447076</link>
		<dc:creator>jmfabianorpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447076</guid>
		<description>I like both Superman II&#039;s...was a bit let down that the Donner one didn&#039;t have an ending proper, but that couldn&#039;t have been helped for obvious reasons.  

Bryan Singer must have been pissed when he got around to watching that, as if you take the Donner cut as canon, the direction Superman Returns tried to go into doesn&#039;t make as much sense (if Supes turned back time again, does that mean he DIDN&#039;T sleep with Lois?  Hence, no Super-kid?  [have to use a non-lawsuit violating name there])</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both Superman II&#8217;s&#8230;was a bit let down that the Donner one didn&#8217;t have an ending proper, but that couldn&#8217;t have been helped for obvious reasons.  </p>
<p>Bryan Singer must have been pissed when he got around to watching that, as if you take the Donner cut as canon, the direction Superman Returns tried to go into doesn&#8217;t make as much sense (if Supes turned back time again, does that mean he DIDN&#8217;T sleep with Lois?  Hence, no Super-kid?  [have to use a non-lawsuit violating name there])</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmfabianorpl</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447075</link>
		<dc:creator>jmfabianorpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447075</guid>
		<description>Actually...

[spoiler alert]...it&#039;s &quot;No.  I am your father.”[/]

;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually&#8230;</p>
<p>[spoiler alert]&#8230;it&#8217;s &#8220;No.  I am your father.”[/]</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.rspwfaq.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merskamp</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447032</link>
		<dc:creator>merskamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447032</guid>
		<description>God no! Rocky Five is horrible on EVERY level, four at least had awesome soundtrack and an unstoppable Russian on steroids.  Its bad but enjoyable whereas 5 is just torture to sit through - its so bad Stallone had to come back and make another and then not acknowledge 5 in the story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God no! Rocky Five is horrible on EVERY level, four at least had awesome soundtrack and an unstoppable Russian on steroids.  Its bad but enjoyable whereas 5 is just torture to sit through &#8211; its so bad Stallone had to come back and make another and then not acknowledge 5 in the story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravenbomb</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-447028</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravenbomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-447028</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll try to list ones that I haven&#039;t seen mentioned (in no particular order):

-Dawn of the Dead
-Sanjuro
-Britannia Hospital
-The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
-The Colour of Money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll try to list ones that I haven&#8217;t seen mentioned (in no particular order):</p>
<p>-Dawn of the Dead<br />
-Sanjuro<br />
-Britannia Hospital<br />
-The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly<br />
-The Colour of Money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whitefish</title>
		<link>http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/14/sequels-that-didnt-suck/comment-page-1/#comment-446966</link>
		<dc:creator>whitefish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rspwfaq.com/2008/08/sequels-that-didnt-suck/#comment-446966</guid>
		<description>I like III, not as much as II, but III is great.

Rocky IV is a 90 minute music video. Sorry to say, but Rocky V is better than IV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like III, not as much as II, but III is great.</p>
<p>Rocky IV is a 90 minute music video. Sorry to say, but Rocky V is better than IV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
